<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Recuva Portable - Recommended Version not Available]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I am using the <strong>Portable Version</strong> of <strong>Recuva</strong>.<br />
The problem here is, that Piriform <strong>did not update</strong> the <strong>Portable Version</strong> for a longer time.<br />
Means, the update you offer for the <strong>Portable Version</strong> is <strong>not available</strong>.</p>
<p dir="auto">For <strong>CCleaner</strong> there is a <strong>Download Builds</strong> page available, where you can download all versions: <a href="https://www.ccleaner.com/ccleaner/builds" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.ccleaner.com/ccleaner/builds</a><br />
Here you get the <strong>Installer</strong> but also the <strong>Portable Version</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">At the <strong>Download Builds</strong> page for <strong>Recuva</strong> there is <strong>only the installer available</strong>::<br />
<a href="https://www.ccleaner.com/recuva/builds" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.ccleaner.com/recuva/builds</a></p>
<p dir="auto">I also started a forum topic in the Piriform forums:<br />
<a href="https://community.ccleaner.com/topic/62402-recuva-portable/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://community.ccleaner.com/topic/62402-recuva-portable/</a></p>
<p dir="auto">Here I got the links to <strong>Speccy</strong> and <strong>Recuva</strong> packaged in <strong><a href="http://PortableApps.com" rel="nofollow ugc">PortableApps.com</a></strong>.<br />
So I will use these versions now.</p>
<p dir="auto"><strong>What it means for VulnDetect</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Treat the <strong>installed versions</strong> and the <strong>portable versions</strong> of <strong>all Piriform products</strong> as <strong>separate applications</strong></li>
<li>Also the versions from <strong><a href="http://PortableApps.com" rel="nofollow ugc">PortableApps.com</a></strong> should be treated as <strong>separate applications</strong></li>
<li>Mark my version of <strong>Recuva</strong> as <strong>EOL</strong></li>
</ul>
]]></description><link>https://vulndetect.org/topic/2618/recuva-portable-recommended-version-not-available</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 23:19:14 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://vulndetect.org/topic/2618.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 15 Oct 2023 10:50:30 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Recuva Portable - Recommended Version not Available on Sun, 22 Oct 2023 12:34:18 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/tom" aria-label="Profile: Tom">@<bdi>Tom</bdi></a></strong><br />
I deleted the version from <a href="http://PortableApps.com" rel="nofollow ugc">PortableApps.com</a> and went back to the <strong>official version</strong> from Piriform.</p>
<p dir="auto">So back to the original issue:</p>
<ul>
<li>The <strong>current version</strong> of <strong>Recuva</strong> is <strong>1.53.0.2096</strong></li>
<li>The <strong>current version</strong> of <strong>Recuva Portable</strong> is <strong>1.53.0.1087</strong></li>
</ul>
<p dir="auto">When I start <strong>Recuva Portable</strong>, then I get this message shown:<br />
<img src="/assets/uploads/files/1697977957117-50afb46d-f6a9-4591-a6da-ba7baaa411a8-image.png" alt="50afb46d-f6a9-4591-a6da-ba7baaa411a8-image.png" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /></p>
<p dir="auto">When I click on "Yes" then the following page opens, where I only can download the <strong>Installer of Recuva</strong>:<br />
<a href="https://www.ccleaner.com/recuva/update?v=1.53.1087&amp;l=1033&amp;a=0" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.ccleaner.com/recuva/update?v=1.53.1087&amp;l=1033&amp;a=0</a></p>
<p dir="auto"><strong><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/tom" aria-label="Profile: Tom">@<bdi>Tom</bdi></a></strong> So, what do you recommend here?</p>
]]></description><link>https://vulndetect.org/post/6670</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://vulndetect.org/post/6670</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[OLLI_S]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2023 12:34:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Recuva Portable - Recommended Version not Available on Sun, 22 Oct 2023 10:19:14 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/tom" aria-label="Profile: Tom">@<bdi>Tom</bdi></a></strong><br />
These builds from <a href="http://PortableApps.com" rel="nofollow ugc">PortableApps.com</a> are <strong>3rd party repacks</strong> and <strong>not official from Piriform</strong>.<br />
Therefore I suggest, that you <strong>DO NOT ADD IT</strong> in VulnDetect.<br />
<strong>Add only</strong> the <strong>official releases</strong>.</p>
<p dir="auto">If you agree, I would close this issue with the status "<strong>[Declined]</strong>".</p>
]]></description><link>https://vulndetect.org/post/6667</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://vulndetect.org/post/6667</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[OLLI_S]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2023 10:19:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Recuva Portable - Recommended Version not Available on Mon, 16 Oct 2023 17:52:25 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/olli_s" aria-label="Profile: OLLI_S">@<bdi>OLLI_S</bdi></a> I will have to look deeper at this and find out with customers how prevalent this is and if it offers general value.</p>
<p dir="auto">My initial point of view is that it often will be a duplication of these 450 or so apps that they support. And the issue is that I don't know if the issue we see with Speccy affects 1% or 99% of them. And for each that uses a different version, we would have to correlate the potentially unknown and unrelated version with the changelog from the original vendor.</p>
<p dir="auto">For some that may be easy, but for Speccy I can't see how we can do it.</p>
<p dir="auto">What you showed me with Speccy makes it a completely "new" and independent product, will PortableApps display e.g. security information (if that ever becomes relevant)?</p>
]]></description><link>https://vulndetect.org/post/6648</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://vulndetect.org/post/6648</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2023 17:52:25 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>