This feature has been implemented in the Corporate Version of VulnDetect.
Here you see a screen shot, how it looks there:
2024-02-10_18h17_17(1).png
Therefore, I mark this topic as Implemented.
This feature has been implemented in the Corporate Version of VulnDetect.
Here you see a screen shot, how it looks there:
2024-02-11_10h47_13.png
Therefore, I mark this topic as Implemented.
This feature has been implemented in the Corporate Version of VulnDetect.
Here you see a screen shot, how it looks there:
13036ea8-2ef5-4ace-8ae3-f5b059b42ce0-image.png
Therefore, I mark this topic as Implemented.
@tom IMHO it would make sense to show the "(64-Bit)" behind the name of the application, so users see the differences between two identical apps at once (without having to expand the entries).
By the way: if you set an entry to [Implemented], then you also have to update the Overview of Feature and Functionality Requests.
So just leave a comment, that it is implemented, and I will do the rest.
I measured all colour contrast in the Business Edition and created the topic Colour Contrast Issues (Business Edition).
This new topic also includes the colour contrast of the status icons.
So I close this topic.
The width of the column "Version Number" is now adjusted, so longer version numbers like "Version 1905 Build 11629.20246" are completely shown.
Also the text "Unknown version, please report" is now shown completely.
So this suggestion is implemented.
This is not very intuitive and a bad usability, me and some other users did not know that entries in the list can be expanded.
So I suggested: Add icons to indicate collapse feature