Please allow to add multiple computers in the settings, so I can scan multiple computers for available updates.
This is very useful for families (in my family there are multiple computers and VMs), but also for companies.
Please show the scan results of all computers in the list of applications.
Show here a separate table for each computer.
And please show the computer name at top of each table (this is the reason why renaming a computer is so important).
When I installed the VulnDetect Agent on my computer I did not see anything about the agent (no visual indicator that the VulnDetect Agent is installed and running like a desktop icon or a icon in the system tray).
So please show a VulnDetect icon in the System Tray of Windows.
This icon is required for several other suggestions, like:
It would be very useful when I could exclude specific drives and also specific folders from being scanned.
I have two external backup drives, that are connected only Saturdays (for backup purpose) but while they are connected a scan could start and this way the scan takes very long and also backed up portable applications are found (this inflates the list of installed applications).
But I also have a large folder containing many photos that I also would like to exclude.
I know that photos are not detected but VulnDetect scans all folders and subfolders and excluding folders could save time.
The software-update tool that I am currently using shows the text "(64 Bit)" to indicate that an application is installed in the 64-Bit version.
This information is interesting to know, so it should also be displayed behind the application name.
I am not sure if there could be different versions available of the same application in 32-Bit and 64-Bit.
If yes, then it is important that you separate between 32-Bit and 64-Bit.
The VulnDetect icon in the System tray should show a notification window telling me:
In this dialog there should be a button "Show Details...".
When the user clicks it, then Open the VulnDetect website from the VulnDetect Agent.
For business users this feature (showing a notification window) should be configurable.
So the administrator can allow of forbid this feature.
If the administrator has disabled this feature, then the administrator gets an email with the scan result (also this is configurable).
At the moment you have the status values:
It would be good when you add the additional status Outdated (a normal non-security related update is available)
With the status Outdated VulnDetect could report all available updates, not just security updates.
So VulnDetect could replace all update managers out there in the market.
In VulnDetect you show the status "Unsafe" but this can have different reasons:
It would be useful when you show why an application is unsafe.
For users it is important to know if they can do anything or not.
So they need to know "Your app is up-to-date but still has vulnerabilities".
Otherwise I have 5 apps with the status "unsafe" although they are all up-to-date (and I don't understand this and blame VulnDetect).
@KI108
Tom explained in the https://vulndetect.org/topic/150/solved-opera-installed-version-not-detected/5 what the status "Unknown" means.
This is the reason why I suggested Explain the Labels in the List of Applications (so you might up-vote this suggestion).
In the list of applications you should add a column "Available Version" where you show the version number of available updates.
For Firefox the available version would be 60.0.1 while the installed version is 59.0.3.
If an application is Up-To-Date, then display "Up-To-Date" instead of a version number in the column "Available Version".
I downloaded the installer from our FTP repository and wanted to install it in my VM.
But unfortunately the installation was not possible (there seems to be an online check that failed)
Tom, today I read that the Kaspersky Software Updater is no longer supported by AO Kaspersky Lab from June 14, 2019:
https://help.kaspersky.com/KSU/2.0/en-US/126813.htm
So you should mark this product End of Life.
Added the colour contrast for the white exclamation mark on red background (on page "Hosts)
I found a small issue in the 2FA login:
The field where I enter the 2FA code is not named properly, so password managers can not fill this fields.
I am using KeePassXC and this password manager does not only fill the username and password into login fields (if the URL matches), it also fills the 2FA code in the login form.
KeePassXC can generate the 2FA codes.
Normally I see in the field where I have to enter the 2FA code a green icon on the right:
I just click this icon and KeePassXC fills the 2FA code.
At VulnDetect this icon is missing:
So here I have to switch to KeePassXC, search for the entry "VulnDetect", select the entry in the search results, manually copy the 2FA code and paste it in the field.
The fix is very easy and described here:
https://github.com/keepassxreboot/keepassxc-browser/issues/826
So please fix this, all users using password managers will benefit from it.
Added the colour contrast for the white exclamation mark on yellow background (on page "Hosts)
Besides to the QR-Code many services offer the Two-Factor-Token also as plain text (the part behind secret=) that can be copied to the clipboard and then inserted in any Two Factor App on the Desktop.
I am using KeePassXC and this client can also generate 2FA keys for the two-factor-authentication.
I am lucky that many services like GitHub, Google and Paypal (just some examples) offer the Two-Factor-Token as plain text.
Otherwise I have to use a QR-Code scanner on my phone, scan this code, send me the code from my phone to myself, open the mail app, copy the code (the part behind secret=) and paste it in KeePassXC.
Showing the Two-Factor-Token makes it much easier for me (and also other users).
I measured all colour contrast in the Business Edition and created the topic Colour Contrast Issues (Business Edition).
This new topic also includes the colour contrast of the status icons.
So I close this topic.
I checked the colour contrast in the business version of VulnDetect.
For most elements the colour contrast is fulfilling the requirements, so here I list only those elements where the colour contrast is not sufficient.
I know there is a gap between design (what it looking good and sexy) and the required colour contrast. But these requirements are important for all users, not only for users that have visual impairments.
All text elements, images containing text and relevant elements without text (e.g. icons) a minimum colour contrast ratio of 4.5:1 is required (to fulfil level AA of the WCAG). For content with a font size of at least 18 Point or 14 Point plus bold a colour contrast ratio of 3.0:1 is required.
Disabled elements (like disabled toolbar icons or disabled edit fields) are excluded from measurement.
International standards:
I really wonder if it is possible to search for updates of Windows via command line.
This would be a real benefit for users if you start the check via VulnDetect and then show a message in the list of applications that there are Windows Updates available.
I really wonder if it is possible to search for updates of Windows Store Apps via command line.
This would be a real benefit for users if you start the check via VulnDetect.